The community criticized a blog on 2nd May by the Council of Economic Advisors (CEA). The CEA is a U.S agency with the crucial role of advising the nation’s president on economic policy and offering most of the empirical research for the White House.
War on Cryptos Extends to Climate Effect
The current president’s administration is committed to reducing the cryptocurrencies’ supposed effect on climate change by renewing its push for a 30 percent Digital Asset Mining Energy (DAME) tax on cryptocurrency miners. This tax was initially announced on 9th March as part of Biden’s budget for the financial year 2024 and aims to enforce an excise tax on the electricity that crypto miners utilize.
A statement by the Department of Treasury showed that the excise tax was necessary since it would minimize digital asset miners’ activities and their negative impacts and harms on the environment. A day later, Bitcoin (BTC) fell under 20000 dollars.
New Tax Target to Reduce Overall Crypto Impact on the Environment
A statement by CEA on 2nd May has revived the proposal with justifications concerning the need to implement the new tax. According to the agency, crypto mining organizations are not obligated to pay the total cost enacted on others in various forms, including increased energy prices, local environmental pollution, and the effects of high greenhouse gas production on the climate.
As such, there is a need to encourage organizations to start being accountable for the dangers they have to society. Despite crypto assets being virtual, the energy use linked to their intensive production is quite real and also involves real costs.
White House Considers Proposed Tax as Means to Lower Negative Spillovers
This blog also indicated reports showing that crypto mining possesses some negative impacts. Examples include negative spillovers that impact the quality of life, the environment, and electricity grids.
In addition, the pollution associated with electricity generation significantly affects communities of color and low-income places, resulting in high electricity costs for clients. The blog also shows that using current clean power, for instance, hydropower, for crypto mining may still negatively affect the environment. For instance, it can compel other electricity users to embrace ‘dirtier’ sources instead of clean ones.
Taxation Likely to Force Innovation Exit from US
The Council of Economic Advisers’ Twitter threat has been heavily criticized by society. For instance, some consider it publicity and misinformation. In addition, a tweet claimed that this kind of tax is highly likely to push the mining of Bitcoin to Russia as well as other nations.
While a fair and effective tax is critical to secure additional public revenues, the recent proposal mirrors a freshly injected thorn to a healing wound. Crypto companies already punished by US regulation through enforcement will likely exit the stage to crypto-friendly jurisdictions.
SureTradeGroup.com is not responsible for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or any other content posted on the site. Some of the content on this site is paid content that is not written or posted by our writers or editors and the opinions expressed do not reflect the opinions of this website. Any disagreement you may have with brands or companies mentioned in articles will need to be taken care of directly with those specific brands and companies. The responsibility of anyone who may click links in our articles and ultimately sign up for that product or service is their own. Forex, Stocks, Cryptocurrencies, NFTs and Dogital Tokens are all a high-risk asset, investing in them can lead to losses. Readers should do their own research before taking any action.