According to Meta, the parent company of Facebook, 5G infrastructure should go above and beyond in using metaverse technologies. The company notes that, in time, the metaverse can deliver real-time augmented reality to mobile devices.
According to the company, no extra investments will be needed in the 5G networks. This post goes far in the latest debates about fair share rocking the European Union. European big networks want to coerce big tech companies to help pay for their networks.
It is, therefore, not surprising to hear that companies like Meta do not want this. According to two executives from Meta, the network proposals from the EU are based on false premises, and the absorption of the Metaverse tech will not lead to higher network usage.
The executives deny the telcos’ notions on the basis that the development of the metaverse and its technologies will not require the telecommunications company to invest more in the technology to make the technologies possible.
They also claim that the mobile AR and VR segments will be run on normal networks with low latency and will enable the use of such devices in Wi-Fi hotspots and areas with 5G connectivity. These fixed networks will be able to support the technologies without the need for better infrastructure than already exists.
The executives also note that no evidence suggests using AR or any metaverse technology will lead to network constraints. They say that this is because of the latency features in 5G. On the other hand, another executive of Meta, Dan Rabinovitsj, had claimed the exact opposite more than a year ago.
The executive mentioned that there would be a need to make huge advancements in network symmetry, latency, and overall speed of the networks to roll out the metaverse into reality. Furthermore, he reiterated that the video would require revolutionary network improvements that seem far off for the metaverse to be immersive.
Get The Other Side to Pay
Fair contribution refers to the idea that providers should pay in telecommunications. The telcos have had a rough time with the 2020 pandemic, recent economic tightening, and looming recession. However, big tech companies like Meta and Google enjoyed massive profits in the lead-up to 2022 before they also felt the effects of the recession, leading to mass layoffs.
The losses on the telcos’ side are why they are prompting the argument that tech providers should pay the networks that help convey their products. The argument is also based on how automakers like Ford pay for roads and how television makers pay for electricity.
The debate has been a hot topic in the EU and the US for years, with everyone having different opinions. This problem has been seen in South Korea, where Netflix and SK Broadband have been in a legal battle over who should be liable for the video traffic from Squid Game, the hit TV show.
This development has led the country’s regulators to develop a Network Fee Prevention Act that will stop companies like Netflix from freely using networks, especially when generating as much traffic as it does.
It will be interesting to see where these new legal battles go. Still, as for accountability, the question lies with big tech, which has a corporate responsibility to ensure that the space rules remain fair.
SureTradeGroup.com is not responsible for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products or any other content posted on the site. Some of the content on this site is paid content that is not written or posted by our writers or editors and the opinions expressed do not reflect the opinions of this website. Any disagreement you may have with brands or companies mentioned in articles will need to be taken care of directly with those specific brands and companies. The responsibility of anyone who may click links in our articles and ultimately sign up for that product or service is their own. Forex, Stocks, Cryptocurrencies, NFTs and Dogital Tokens are all a high-risk asset, investing in them can lead to losses. Readers should do their own research before taking any action.